Best Overall Tumor Response for Solid Tumors
Introduction Efficacy assessment of solid tumour cancer is usually based on imaging (E.g. CT-Scan, MRI). In the past several attempts to define a standard criteria for solid tumor efficacy assessment were made:
These guidelines are standardizing solid tumour measurements and objective assessment definition for change in tumour size. |
Recist Today RECIST 1.1 despite some existing criticism, is the recognized standard approach for defining tumor response for solid tumors and therefore for defining the Progression Free Survival (PFS). RECIST is a validated and « simplified » version of WHO specifically to be used in adult and paediatric cancer clinical trials (not in malignant brain tumour or malignant lymphoma studies). MEASURABLE LESION or TARGET LESION It can be measured in one diameter:
RECIST recommends a maximum of 10 measurable lesions (biggest and most suitable for repeated measures), maximum 5 measurable lesions per organ. NON MEASURABLE LESION or NON TARGET LESION All other lesions, for example:
Often having at least one measurable lesion is an eligibility criteria to enter into the study. RECIST recommends to perform a tumor assessment at regular intervals (usually every 2 cycles). An assessment time-point is considered valid for the overall response evaluation if:
|
Definition of Best Overall Tumor Response The Best Overall Response (BOR) is the best response recorded from the start of the study treatment until the disease progression/recurrence:
A requirement for SD is that it should be met at least once no less than 6-8 weeks after the first dose of trial treatment/baseline assessment, otherwise the best response will be Not Evaluable (NE). The criteria for confirmation of the response is summarized in the following table:
|
Definition of Time Point Overall Response Target Lesions Response:
Non Target Lesions Response:
The time-point overall response is then derived according to the criteria reported in the following table:
The objective response rate (the proportion of patients in whom a CR or PR was observed) could be also reported and analysed. |